Hãy viết lại bài viết dài kèm hashtag về việc đánh giá sản phẩm và mua ngay tại Queen Mobile bằng tiếng VIệt: Meta Quest 3 vs Apple Vision Pro: Which One Is Better, and for What?

Mua ngay sản phẩm tại Việt Nam:
QUEEN MOBILE chuyên cung cấp điện thoại Iphone, máy tính bảng Ipad, đồng hồ Smartwatch và các phụ kiện APPLE và các giải pháp điện tử và nhà thông minh. Queen Mobile rất hân hạnh được phục vụ quý khách….

Mua #Điện_thoại #iphone #ipad #macbook #samsung #xiaomi #poco #oppo #snapdragon giá tốt, hãy ghé [𝑸𝑼𝑬𝑬𝑵 𝑴𝑶𝑩𝑰𝑳𝑬] ✿ 149 Hòa Bình, phường Hiệp Tân, quận Tân Phú, TP HCM
✿ 402B, Hai Bà Trưng, P Tân Định, Q 1, HCM
✿ 287 đường 3/2 P 10, Q 10, HCM
Hotline (miễn phí) 19003190
Thu cũ đổi mới
Rẻ hơn hoàn tiền
Góp 0%

Thời gian làm việc: 9h – 21h.

KẾT LUẬN

Hãy viết đoạn tóm tắt về nội dung bằng tiếng việt kích thích người mua: Meta Quest 3 vs Apple Vision Pro: Which One Is Better, and for What?

I spent 30 minutes in an intense boxing workout. My heart rate hit 150, and I could feel it. It was great. Coach Doc is serious. I followed through and did a cool-down exercise — and all of this happened inside the . Then I wiped down the headset and then got back to work… inside the .

That describes my life in mixed-reality headsets lately. Meta’s $500 Quest 3 and Apple’s $3,500 Vision Pro feel very different but also very much the same; it just depends on how you look at them. 

I’ve had VR and AR devices in my life for years, but for many people, the decision to put an immersive device on your face is still pretty new. Apple is the latest company entering a space where Meta, aka Facebook, has been for nearly a decade. The was my favorite VR headset ever made, and it was affordable. But the Quest 3 and Vision Pro, both introduce ideas that will influence the landscape for years. 

Watch this: Apple Vision Pro vs. Meta Quest 3: Breaking Down the Hype

19:49

Mixed reality: Virtual blends with the real, to different degrees

The Meta Quest 3 and Apple Vision Pro are both standalone VR headsets with mixed-reality passthrough capabilities. These goggle-like headsets, which tighten over your face, have arrays of cameras on the outside that capture the real world and show it to you on displays inside. Virtual displays, games and even 3D objects can be layered over the real world. Each headset uses depth sensors to accurately mesh your real-world space with these virtual objects.

The Quest 3’s color camera quality is much better than the Quest 2’s black-and-white cameras, but the view is still fuzzy and somewhat distorted. The 3D video feed is good enough to see things around you, and to check messages on a phone or watch — but you may have to squint a bit. I found it hard to see my laptop screen, though.

The Vision Pro’s cameras are much sharper and are good enough to briefly use your phone through the headset. They’re still not as good as your own vision, though, and Apple’s micro-OLED displays have a bit of motion blur.

Meta and Apple allow apps to float over the real world, but the Quest 3 can only run one app at a time, unless you’re using the browser and a 2D app. The Vision Pro can multitask with many apps simultaneously, making it feel more like a real office tool.

But Apple’s headset doesn’t use the dimensions of your real-world much for immersive mixed reality experiences yet, even though it’s constantly pinging your space. It mostly floats 2D windows, although apps like Jigspace, DJay and 3D board games, show where things could go next. The Quest 3 has some mixed-reality games, fitness apps and creative tools that turn walls and floors into portals and playgrounds, but not a huge amount. Apple’s hardware is better, but no headset is making the most of mixed reality. Passthrough is mostly useful for helping you see the space around you without feeling as closed in.

That’s just using your headset as a display for your computer, though. Where the Vision Pro has a longer-term edge is its access to thousands of iOS apps. These can be opened and multitasked all around you. Then there’s Siri and Apple’s other services, which run mostly like they do on iPads or iPhones. FaceTime call? Zoom? Slack? Microsoft Office? Apple Music? Yes to all of them.

Meta also has a collection of 2D apps, including Microsoft Office apps, but the Quest’s OS isn’t part of Google’s ecosystem. You need to sign into apps one by one or find Facebook apps to hook in with. The process isn’t nearly as seamless. But Apple’s headset has tons of first-gen bugs, too. 

The multitasking capabilities of the Vision Pro are a huge advantage. Apps can be opened simultaneously all over, making the OS feel much more flexible than Quest’s.

Fitness: My favorite VR activity is mostly Quest-only

I’ve become a big VR fitness fan lately. , a subscription-based dance and boxing program that uses holograms of real trainers and pairs with an Apple Watch for heart-rate readings, is a part of my daily routine. Many people use the Quest is , mainly because these active exercise apps are widespread. The Quest can do some basic activity tracking, which hooks into iOS and Android. 

The Quest 3 has almost entirely become a fitness device for me. That’s a role the Vision Pro can’t fill right now because the apps and the fitness ecosystem support simply aren’t there. 

There are a few active apps for the Vision Pro: Synth Riders, for instance, is a dance and music game, but it’s also available on the Quest. Using only my hands means there’s no vibrating haptic feedback, which I get with Meta’s controllers and is key for letting me know when I hit targets. The Vision Pro’s weight and battery pack also make it feel less fitness-ready. There are a few meditation apps in the Vision Pro’s app store, so mindfulness is an area for growth. Still, the Quest 3 is much more fitness-forward. 

Spatial videos: They can both do it

Apple’s headset plays recorded on either the Vision Pro or on the , and does a great job at it. They feel like snippets of relived memories. Not to be left out, the Quest 3 added recently, and it syncs Apple’s iPhone videos. They don’t play as high-res or as smoothly as on Vision Pro, based on initial tests, but they do play. Expect Meta to make its own 3D cameras (likely of its ) to compete and offer a more affordable way to share memories with family.

The future will look more like the Vision Pro

Apple’s headset is stunning for videos and films, and it’s the best VR/AR headset I’ve used for laptop-style 2D work. However, the headset’s potential lies in the future. Apple’s room-tracking sensors should blend the real and virtual more, and Apple’s iOS framework should enable sharing and collaboration in virtual spaces better than any other device. But those things haven’t fully evolved yet. Also, why doesn’t the Vision Pro work with AR-capable iPhones and iPads yet? Why doesn’t the wearable, haptics-equipped Apple Watch offer feedback in virtual experiences? I don’t know, but they should be part of the picture.

The Vision Pro is only a few weeks old, whereas the Quest platform is five years old. Meta had VR hardware for years before that, too. If you’re curious about VR and AR, the Quest 3 is still the best affordable headset to play with and try mixed reality. The Vision Pro has parts that totally outshine it, but it’s also something I’d very much wait on for its extremely high price. And don’t forget: Meta, in addition to , have next-gen hardware in the works also. The Quest 3 is the easiest recommendation for now, but Apple’s hardware is going to be the shape of the where the landscape is heading in the years to come.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=();t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)(0);
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘set’, ‘autoConfig’, false, ‘789754228632403’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘789754228632403’);

Xem chi tiết và đăng kýXem chi tiết và đăng ký