Hãy viết lại bài viết dài kèm hashtag về việc đánh giá sản phẩm và mua ngay tại Queen Mobile bằng tiếng VIệt: I tested an $8,000 Hasselblad camera against a $1,000 Fujifilm — here’s what happened

Mua ngay sản phẩm tại Việt Nam:
QUEEN MOBILE chuyên cung cấp điện thoại Iphone, máy tính bảng Ipad, đồng hồ Smartwatch và các phụ kiện APPLE và các giải pháp điện tử và nhà thông minh. Queen Mobile rất hân hạnh được phục vụ quý khách….

Mua #Điện_thoại #iphone #ipad #macbook #samsung #xiaomi #poco #oppo #snapdragon giá tốt, hãy ghé [𝑸𝑼𝑬𝑬𝑵 𝑴𝑶𝑩𝑰𝑳𝑬] ✿ 149 Hòa Bình, phường Hiệp Tân, quận Tân Phú, TP HCM
✿ 402B, Hai Bà Trưng, P Tân Định, Q 1, HCM
✿ 287 đường 3/2 P 10, Q 10, HCM
Hotline (miễn phí) 19003190
Thu cũ đổi mới
Rẻ hơn hoàn tiền
Góp 0%

Thời gian làm việc: 9h – 21h.

KẾT LUẬN

Hãy viết đoạn tóm tắt về nội dung bằng tiếng việt kích thích người mua: I tested an $8,000 Hasselblad camera against a $1,000 Fujifilm — here’s what happened

I love my job, in large part because I get to test out some of the best cameras around. Recently, I was even lucky enough to try out Hasselblad’s 907X + CFV 100C — the Swedish manufacturer’s latest retro-styled medium format monster. The 907X + CFV 100C costs a butt-clenching $8,000 (and that’s without lenses) and packs a 100MP sensor.

You can read more in our Hasselblad 907X + CFV 100C review, but to sum it up: it’s a camera aimed mostly at professionals or wealthy enthusiasts who value image quality over everything else. 100MP gives you the kind of detail you need if you’re shooting for Gucci’s next billboard campaign.

To see how much of a difference that 100MP sensor makes versus a “normal” camera, I took one of my spare cameras — a 26MP Fujifilm X-T4 that can be picked up used for around $1,000 — with me everywhere I went with the Hasselblad, photographing the same scenes.

I then showed both sets of images side-by-side to the Tom’s Guide team, to see if they could tell which was from the $8,000 Hasselblad and which was from the $1,000 Fujifilm. Would the extra $7,000 be that obvious to casual viewers?

T3’s Andy Sansom identified the higher levels of contrast in the Fujifilm image, which gave the paving slabs along the water better definition.

Winner: Fujifilm. 

Image 6 — Dragon Bowl Fountain

Here’s another win for Fujifilm’s black and white Acros profile with this photo of the Dragon Bowl Fountain in Dyffryn Gardens. 5 out of 6 thought the Fuji image was from a more expensive camera, although again there was a lot of head scratching trying to come to a decision.

Image 1 of 2

Both images are shot in relatively flat lighting, resulting in less contrast, making it harder to tell between the two black and white profiles. Once again, the experienced photographer John instantly identified the Hasselblad photo.

Hint: the giveaway in this one is the wheelbarrow!

Winner: Fujifilm

Image 7 — Cactus

For the final test, I applied Fujifilm’s Velvia color profile to this photo of a cactus, which tends to suit nature and landscape photography thanks to its vivid color rendition.

Image 1 of 2

4 out of 6 felt the Hasselblad photo was better, thanks to the more natural coloring and higher levels of sharpness. Even at 72 DPI and without zooming in, the Hasselblad image is much sharper, especially around the super fine spines and the intricate texture of the inner walls of the cactus flowers.

Winner: Hasselblad.

Verdict

OK, so I know this wasn’t the most rigorous or scientific of tests, and was mainly conducted for fun, to see if I could get some similar results with a much cheaper camera. It also proved the obvious point that an extra $7,000, 74 more megapixels and a whopping great big sensor will get you much higher detail when you pixel peep.

The Hasselblad’s images are much sharper, even when scaled down to 72 DPI, and the natural color profile comes up victorious in certain situations. It was telling that an experienced photographer was almost instantly able to tell the Hasselblad in most situations.

That said, the $1,000 Fujifilm did way better than I expected, and proved that normal people — i.e. not experienced photographers — viewing photos on a screen often can’t tell the difference. In most cases, people aren’t zooming in and pixel peeping, and are often swayed instead by creative decisions like stylistic color profiles, or striking contrast. Skirting Hasselblad’s legendary color science ended up being a super easy way to get people to think an image was higher quality, or at least make it more difficult to tell.

The good news, though, is that if you’re just shooting for Instagram or regular size prints and haven’t got any billboard campaigns booked, you needn’t remortgage your house to buy the Hasselblad.

Answers

1. A = Hasselblad; B = Fuji

2. A = Fuji; B = Hasselblad

3. A = Fuji; B = Hasselblad

4. A = Fuji; B = Hasselblad

5. A = Hasselblad; B = Fuji

6. A = Fuji; B = Hasselblad

7. A = Fuji; B = Hasselblad

More from Tom’s Guide

Xem chi tiết và đăng ký