Hãy viết lại bài viết dài kèm hashtag về việc đánh giá sản phẩm và mua ngay tại Queen Mobile bằng tiếng VIệt: Apple’s reportedly plans a different way of training AI for Apple GPT

Mua ngay sản phẩm tại Việt Nam:
QUEEN MOBILE chuyên cung cấp điện thoại Iphone, máy tính bảng Ipad, đồng hồ Smartwatch và các phụ kiện APPLE và các giải pháp điện tử và nhà thông minh. Queen Mobile rất hân hạnh được phục vụ quý khách….
_____________________________________________________
Mua #Điện_thoại #iphone #ipad #macbook #samsung #xiaomi #poco #oppo #snapdragon giá tốt, hãy ghé [𝑸𝑼𝑬𝑬𝑵 𝑴𝑶𝑩𝑰𝑳𝑬] ✿ 149 Hòa Bình, phường Hiệp Tân, quận Tân Phú, TP HCM
✿ 402B, Hai Bà Trưng, P Tân Định, Q 1, HCM
✿ 287 đường 3/2 P 10, Q 10, HCM
Hotline (miễn phí) 19003190
Thu cũ đổi mới
Rẻ hơn hoàn tiền
Góp 0%

Thời gian làm việc: 9h – 21h.

KẾT LUẬN

Hãy viết đoạn tóm tắt về nội dung bằng tiếng việt kích thích người mua: Apple’s reportedly plans a different way of training AI for Apple GPT

Yesterday, it became clear that Apple is exploring ways of allowing large language models (LLM) to run on low-memory devices like iPhones, potentially leading to the company unleashing AI in iOS 18. Today, we’ve got an insight into how Apple is looking to differentiate itself from the ChatGPTs of this world.

The New York Times reveals that rather than scraping the internet and books to teach generative AI systems, Apple is looking for something a bit more controlled, reliable and legally watertight. According to four insiders, the company has reached out to various publishers offering multi-year licensing deals “worth at least $50 million” for the purposes of training AI on news articles.

when he said Apple would pursue generative AI “responsibly.” On the other, it’s a significantly smaller pool to learn from, which could lead to big gaps in knowledge in a hypothetical Apple GPT.

Whether this will see Apple’s AI at a disadvantage compared to the likes of ChatGPT in part depends on what Apple intends to use it for. And apparently, the company has been quite vague about this, even in discussions with publishers. One reason some publishers have been hesitant to embrace the deal is because Apple could end up using generative AI to deliver news on its devices, which would make it a competitor rather than a partner.

Another possible sticking point is that Apple’s pitch reportedly stated that publishers could potentially be “on the hook for any legal liabilities” stemming from the AI integration. Which is a bit of a blank check for any company to sign, no matter how big the initial payment.

However, despite skepticism from some publishers, others are reportedly “optimistic that Apple’s approach might eventually lead to a meaningful partnership.” 

In part this is because Apple seeking permission — and offering significant compensation — for the use of publishers’ content is in stark contrast to other AI firms, which have been accused of riding roughshod over copyright law. Open AI, Meta and Stability AI have all been targeted by lawsuits from authors alleging their books were unlawfully used for training purposes. 

The New York Times report claims that Apple is reluctant to teach its AI model via the internet, “partly because of its commitment to privacy.” While that may just be spin, it will be interesting to see whether this puts Apple at a rare competitive disadvantage as the AI race heats up in 2024.